Category Archives: ERM

Risk Management and Enterprise Risk Management

Best Practices, Compliance, Controls, COSO, Critical, ERM, Framework, Governance Risk & Compliance, GRC, How To, ISO 31000, ISO Standard, ISO/IEC 27005, Operational Risk Management, Risk Analysis, Risk Assessment, Risk management, Risk-Based, Risks, , , , , , , , ,

Risk Management and Enterprise Risk Management: A Comparative Overview

In the contemporary business landscape, uncertainty is a constant. Organizations must navigate a myriad of risks ranging from financial and operational to strategic and reputational. Two crucial frameworks that help organizations manage these uncertainties are Risk Management (RM) and Enterprise Risk Management (ERM). While they share similarities, they are distinct in their scope, approach, and application. Here’s a brief overview of each:

i. Risk Management

Risk Management is the process of identifying, analyzing, and responding to risks that could potentially affect an organization’s objectives. The key steps typically involved in risk management are:

A. Identification: Recognizing potential risks that could impact the organization.

B. Assessment: Evaluating the likelihood and impact of these risks using qualitative and quantitative methods.

C. Mitigation: Developing strategies to manage, reduce, or eliminate the risks. This may include avoidance, reduction, sharing, or acceptance of the risks.

D. Monitoring and Review: Continuously monitoring the risk environment and reviewing the effectiveness of risk responses to ensure risks are effectively managed.

ii. Enterprise Risk Management (ERM)

Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) is an integrated framework that goes beyond the traditional risk management approach. It focuses on a holistic and organization-wide perspective of identifying, assessing, managing, and monitoring risks across an entire enterprise. ERM aims to provide a structured and consistent process for managing all types of risks that an organization faces.

iii. Key components of ERM include

A. Governance and Culture: Establishing the organization’s risk management framework and embedding risk culture within the organization.

B. Strategy and Objective-Setting: Aligning risk management with the organization’s strategy and setting clear objectives.

C. Performance: Identifying and assessing risks that may impact the achievement of organizational objectives, and integrating risk considerations into performance management.

D. Review and Revision: Monitoring and reviewing risk performance, and making necessary adjustments to the ERM framework and activities.

E. Information, Communication, and Reporting: Ensuring effective communication and reporting of risk information across all levels of the organization.

iv. Differences between Risk Management and ERM

A. Risk Management:

  • Focus: Risk management is a broad term encompassing the identification, assessment, and mitigation of risks that can impact any aspect of an organization. This could be financial risks, operational risks, strategic risks, or even reputational risks.
  • Approach: The RM approach is often reactive and siloed, addressing risks as they arise within specific areas of the organization. It typically involves the following steps:
  • Scope: Risk management can be applied to specific departments, projects, or initiatives within an organization. It’s often a localized approach, focusing on the risks relevant to a particular area.
  • Specificity: Targets specific risks within specific departments or aspects of operations.
  • Reactivity: Often implemented in response to the identification of potential risks.
  • Tactical Approach: Focuses on tactics for handling individual risks.
  • Process: The risk management process typically involves:
    • Identifying potential risks
    • Assessing the likelihood and severity of each risk
    • Developing plans to mitigate or avoid these risks
    • Monitoring and updating risk management strategies as needed
  • Applications: Risk Management is commonly applied within project management, IT security, health and safety, financial auditing, and compliance. Each department or project team may have its risk management process, often leading to isolated risk assessments and responses.

B. Enterprise Risk Management (ERM):

  • Focus: ERM takes a holistic approach to risk management, considering all potential risks that could affect the entire organization and its ability to achieve its objectives. It goes beyond departmental silos and considers the interconnectedness of various risks.
  • Approach: ERM takes a holistic and proactive approach to risk management. It involves:
    • Risk Culture and Governance: Establishing a risk-aware culture and defining roles and responsibilities for risk management.
    • Risk Appetite and Strategy: Defining the level of risk the organization is willing to accept in pursuit of its objectives.
    • Risk Identification and Assessment: Identifying and assessing risks across the organization in a unified manner.
    • Risk Response: Developing strategies that align risk management with the organization’s strategic goals.
    • Risk Monitoring and Reporting: Continuously monitoring risk exposures and reporting to senior management and the board of directors.
  • Scope: ERM has an enterprise-wide perspective, looking at the big picture and how different risks can interact and amplify each other. It considers strategic risks alongside operational and financial risks.
  • Holistic Perspective: Considers all types of risks across the organization as interrelated components that affect each other.
  • Proactivity: Focuses on identifying and mitigating risks before they occur.
  • Strategic Approach: Integrates risk management with corporate strategy and decision-making processes.
  • Process: ERM builds upon the core principles of risk management but expands them to encompass the entire organization. It involves:
    • Identifying all potential risks across the organization
    • Assessing the enterprise-wide impact of each risk
    • Developing a comprehensive risk management strategy that considers all departments and functions
    • Integrating risk management into the organization’s overall strategy and decision-making processes
    • Continuously monitoring and updating the ERM framework
  • Applications: ERM is applied at the strategic level, influencing decision-making processes across the entire organization. It integrates risk management into business planning, performance management, and corporate governance, ensuring that risk considerations are embedded in all significant business activities.

v. Importance of Risk Management and ERM

Both risk management and ERM are critical for an organization’s success. They help in:

o Protecting Assets: Mitigating potential losses and safeguarding resources.

o Enhancing Decision-Making: Providing information that can support informed decision-making.

o Improving Resilience: Preparing the organization to respond to adverse events effectively.

o Achieving Objectives: Ensuring that risks do not derail the organization from reaching its goals.

vi. Strategic Integration

Whereas RM is often tactical, focusing on immediate concerns or specific areas of risk, ERM is inherently strategic. ERM is designed to be part of the organizational fabric, influencing the strategic planning process itself. It helps ensure that risk considerations are an integral part of decision-making at the highest levels.

vii. Value Creation

ERM extends beyond mere risk prevention and mitigation. By integrating risk management with strategic objectives, ERM positions organizations to not only protect value but also to identify and exploit opportunities in a way that RM typically does not. This proactive stance towards risk can lead to innovation and competitive advantage.

viii. Here’s an analogy to illustrate the difference

  • Risk Management: Imagine a house. Risk management is like checking the roof for leaks, the foundation for cracks, and the electrical wiring for safety hazards. It focuses on individual aspects of the house.
  • ERM: ERM is like looking at the entire house and considering all potential hazards, from natural disasters to break-ins. It considers how a leaky roof could lead to electrical problems and how a strong foundation can withstand various threats. It’s a comprehensive approach to ensuring the safety and security of the entire structure.

ix. Benefits of ERM Over Traditional RM

A. Strategic Alignment: ERM ensures that risk management practices are aligned with the organization’s strategic goals, facilitating better decision-making.

B. Holistic View: By considering all types of risks and their interdependencies, ERM provides a comprehensive view of the organization’s risk profile.

C. Improved Performance: Organizations with effective ERM practices can better anticipate and respond to risks, leading to improved operational performance and resilience.

D. Enhanced Communication: ERM promotes transparent communication about risks across the organization, ensuring that all stakeholders are informed and engaged in risk management processes.

E. Regulatory Compliance: ERM helps organizations comply with regulatory requirements by providing a structured approach to identifying and managing risks.

x. Conclusion

An effective risk management or ERM framework can help organizations navigate uncertainties and improve their overall risk posture, ultimately contributing to sustained success and growth.

While Risk Management and Enterprise Risk Management share the common goal of mitigating risks, their approaches, scopes, and outcomes significantly differ. RM offers a focused, tactical method for addressing specialized risks within particular segments of an organization. In contrast, ERM provides a holistic, strategic framework for understanding and managing the array of risks affecting the entire enterprise, thereby enhancing decision-making and promoting value creation. As businesses navigate increasingly complex and volatile environments, integrating ERM into their strategic planning and execution becomes not just advantageous but essential for sustainable success.

xi. Further references

Enterprise Risk Management (ERM): What Is It and How …Investopediahttps://www.investopedia.com › … › Business Essentials

https://www.oracle.com/eg/erp/risk-management/what-is-enterprise-risk-management

https://www.theirm.org/what-we-do/what-is-enterprise-risk-management

https://erm.ncsu.edu/resource-center/what-is-enterprise-risk-management

What is Enterprise Risk Management (ERM)?TechTargethttps://www.techtarget.com › searchcio › definition › e…

Enterprise Risk Management (ERM)Corporate Finance Institutehttps://corporatefinanceinstitute.com › Resources

https://legal.thomsonreuters.com/blog/what-is-enterprise-risk-management

Effective ERM Reporting

Agile, Audit, Best Practices, Coaching, Controls, ERM, Governance Risk & Compliance, Methodology, , , , , , , ,

In a world recovering from the pandemic aftermath, Ukrainian and Middle Eastern wars, risks in one sector of business can set off a chain reaction of effects across the entire supply chain, similar to falling dominos. 

This highlights that the focus of enterprise risk management (ERM) in today’s business environment is not solely about preventing negative incidents; but also about transforming potential risks into business opportunities. 

The key to this transformation lies in effective ERM reporting.

ERM enables organizations to identify possible event occurrences, but it’s through ERM reporting that they can assess their risk management strategies to discover what’s effective, what’s failing, and how to address any potential gaps in risk management.

Efficient ERM reporting can help organizations leverage their risks into a competitive edge. Therefore, it’s crucial for businesses to understand what’s required to generate a high-quality ERM risk report.

What Is an ERM Report? 

An ERM report provides crucial information for daily decision-making by assisting board members in recognizing the risks their organizations confront. Furthermore, it describes the risk management approaches implemented to address these risks.

High-quality ERM reports highlight gaps in the execution or coverage of risk management methods and potential non-compliance scenarios. While this is critical from a strategic point of view, it also has a legal aspect. Boards have legal obligations to comprehend and manage the organization’s risks effectively.

Some key audiences for risk reporting

Risk reporting serves various key audiences within an organization. Here are some key audiences for risk reporting:

A. Board of Directors and Executive Management: The board of directors and executive management team play a crucial role in governing and overseeing the organization. They need comprehensive risk reports to understand the organization’s overall risk landscape, make informed decisions, and fulfill their fiduciary responsibilities.

B. Risk Management Committee: In organizations that have a specific risk management committee, risk reporting is vital. This committee is responsible for reviewing and monitoring the organization’s risk management activities, and risk reports provide them with the necessary information to assess and steer risk management efforts.

C. Senior Management: Senior management includes executives and the CEO, all needing more detail than the board. A risk report for senior management often involves reporting up; they want a list of risks and accompanying mediation plans from their ERM staff. This helps senior management ensure that the proper management strategies are in place for the risks in the report, which can feature as many as 15 possible issues.

D. Risk Owners: Risk owners are the ERM staff on the front line, including middle managers. These individuals act on the mitigation recommendations from senior management and the board. Reports for risk owners require a high level of detail on each risk, including performance metrics and assessments.

E. Operational and Business Unit Managers: Operational and business unit managers are directly responsible for managing specific areas of the organization. Risk reports tailored to their respective areas provide them with visibility into the risks affecting their operations, enabling them to make risk-informed decisions and take appropriate mitigating actions.

F. Compliance and Legal Teams: Risk reporting is essential for compliance and legal teams to ensure that the organization operates within the boundaries of laws, regulations, and industry standards. They rely on risk reports to identify compliance gaps and potential legal risks.

G. Regulators: Regulatory agencies are the primary external audience for risk reports. ERM reporting for regulators requires a careful balance; they must help the regulator understand the risks and assure that the organization meets regulatory requirements without providing so much detail that it will attract further review. 

H. Internal and External Auditors: Internal and external auditors need risk reports to understand the organization’s risk profile and assess the effectiveness of internal controls and risk management processes. Risk reports help them prioritize audit activities and identify areas requiring further scrutiny.

I. Investors and Shareholders: Investors and shareholders are interested in understanding the organization’s risk exposures and management strategies. Risk reporting creates transparency and reassures them that risk-related matters are identified, monitored, and appropriately managed.

J. Employees: While not the primary audience, employees benefit from risk reporting as it provides insights into the organization’s risk culture, potential impacts on their roles, and actions being taken to address risks. It helps foster awareness and accountability throughout the organization.

Each audience may have specific requirements and preferences, so producing tailored risk reports for these stakeholders strengthens risk communication and fosters a risk-aware culture.

Good Practices of an ERM Report

Creating an ERM report that adheres to best practices ensures its effectiveness and usefulness. Here are some key best practices to consider when developing an ERM reporting framework:

A. Clear and Concise Format: Present information in a clear, concise, and logical manner. Use headings, subheadings, and bullet points to enhance readability and facilitate easy navigation within the report.

B. Alignment with Objectives: Ensure that the ERM report directly aligns with the organization’s objectives and risk appetite. The content should focus on the most important risks that can impact the achievement of these objectives.

C. Set Measurable Objectives: The report should be tailored to the organization’s objectives. What are the risks that might prevent the organization from achieving those objectives? This is the basis for a good ERM report. 

D. Comprehensive Risk Coverage: Provide a comprehensive overview of risks, including both internal and external risks. Consider strategic, operational, financial, compliance, and emerging risks to present a holistic view of the organization’s risk landscape.

E. Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis: Combine quantitative data (e.g., risk events, financial impacts) with qualitative analysis (e.g., risk descriptions, likelihood, and impact assessments). This approach provides a balanced perspective on risks and their potential effects.

F. Risk Interdependencies: Highlight interconnections between different risks, demonstrating how a risk in one area can impact other parts of the organization. This understanding helps identify systemic risks and potential cascading effects.

G. Actionable Insights: Provide actionable insights to drive risk management activities. Include risk response strategies, control assessments, and recommendations for risk mitigation or avoidance.

H. Historical Trends and Future Forecasts: Discuss historical trends and patterns to identify areas of concern or improvement. Also, provide forecasts or scenarios to help stakeholders anticipate future risks and plan accordingly.

I. Regular Update Frequency: Develop a schedule for regular reporting updates that suits the organization’s needs and risk dynamics. Ensure that stakeholders receive timely and up-to-date information to support decision-making.

J. Clearly Define the Report: Establish a report structure that defines everything from the recipients to the names of input fields and the calculations required to evaluate each risk. Defining the structure of the report should always come before design. 

K. Continuously Evaluate Report Structures: Risks are constantly evolving, so the report should, too. Organizations should always consider whether they must include more risks in the report or additional fields to deliver the correct information about each risk’s management. 

L. Create a Consistent ERM Language: The board of directors may understand and communicate risk differently than the rest of the ERM team. Ensure employees use the same ERM language to reduce miscommunication surrounding the report. 

M. Use Visual Aids: Incorporate visual elements such as charts, graphs, and visuals to support data interpretation and enhance understanding. Visual representations can communicate complex information more effectively.

N. Ensure Data Is Reliable: For ERM reporting to create a competitive edge, the data must be high quality. Validate all risk sources to ensure reporting is based on high-quality, reliable information. Organizations that integrate ERM enterprise-wide are more likely to have access to trustworthy data. 

O. Outline Key Takeaways: Reports can be long, but senior management and the board of directors don’t always have time to read every page. Highlight critical takeaways so they can easily find and review the action items that matter most.

P. Deliver Reports On Time: Whether organizations deliver reports once a month or once a year, the report should always be on-time according to that timetable. ERM teams should also prepare the information immediately before they deliver it since a report that’s six months old will no longer be helpful to the board.

Q. Show Trends Over Time: Presenting trends over time can provide stakeholders with a better understanding of whether the organization’s risk profile is improving or deteriorating. 

R. Make Reports Actionable: Good ERM reports should empower senior management and the board to take action. Recommended actions and strategies should accompany each risk, giving the board the information they need to move forward.

S. Facilitate Effective Decision-Making: All ERM reports should do one thing: allow the board to make better decisions. These reports should clarify the organization’s potential risks and make it easy for the CEO and the board to take revenue-saving and even revenue-driving action. 

T. Continuous Improvement: Regularly seek feedback from report recipients and stakeholders to improve the clarity, relevance, and value of the ERM report. Adapt and refine the reporting framework based on the evolving needs of the organization.

By employing these best practices, organizations can produce ERM reports that provide valuable insights, support informed decision-making, and drive effective risk management processes.

Benefits of effective ERM reporting:

A. Improved risk management: Effective ERM reporting helps organizations to improve their risk management by:

    o Identifying and assessing risks more effectively

    o Developing and implementing more effective risk management strategies

    o Monitoring and improving the effectiveness of risk management activities

B. Increased stakeholder confidence: Effective ERM reporting helps to increase stakeholder confidence by:

    o Demonstrating that the organization is taking steps to manage its risks

    o Providing stakeholders with the information they need to make informed decisions

C. Reduced costs: Effective ERM reporting can help to reduce costs by:

    o Identifying and mitigating risks before they cause damage

    o Improving the efficiency of risk management activities.

ERM Maturity

The landscape of risk today is constantly shifting, influenced by factors such as digitization, remote work, and the unstable nature of today’s economy. 

To develop an ERM reporting system that bolsters organizational performance, organizations must initially focus on elevating their ERM maturity. 

Though each step towards maturity calls for careful planning, the reward is the creation of an ERM framework that cannot just intercept risks before they affect the business, but also convert those risks into potential opportunities.

By adhering to these recommendations, organizations can build efficient ERM reports that effectively articulate both the potential risks encountered by the organization and the measures being implemented for their management.

https://erpminsights.com/qualities-of-a-good-enterprise-risk-management-report/

Similarities between ISO 31000 and COSO ERM 2017

Best Practices, Coaching, Comparison, COSO, ERM, Governance Risk & Compliance, ISO Standard, Methodology

ISO 31000 and COSO ERM 2017 are both well-known risk management frameworks that organizations use to identify, assess, and mitigate risk. 

Here are some of the shared traits between these two:

A. Philosophy: Both ISO 31000 and COSO ERM 2017 share a similar philosophy when it comes to risk management: Risk is part of every activity, and therefore, the risk management process shouldn’t be seen as a separate task, but rather as an inherent part of all decision-making processes.

B. Holistic Approach to Risk Management: Both frameworks emphasize the importance of integrating risk management into all aspects of an organization’s operations. They advocate for a comprehensive and systematic approach to identifying, assessing, and managing risks across the entire enterprise.

C. Scope and Purpose: Both guidelines are designed to provide a usable standard to help an organization manage risk effectively. They aim to minimize potential negative impacts (risks) while maximizing potential opportunities.

D. Risk-Based Approach: Both frameworks promote a risk-based approach, focusing on identifying, assessing, and prioritizing risks based on their likelihood and impact. This approach ensures that resources are allocated to address the most significant risks.

E. Risk Appetite: Both frameworks highlight the importance of setting a risk appetite level. The risk appetite signifies the amount and type of risk that an organization is willing to take in pursuit of value.

F. Risk Ownership: ISO 31000 and COSO ERM 2017 both emphasize the importance of every stakeholder, department, and the employee in an organization to recognize and own the risks related to their area of operation or expertise.

G. Risk Assessment: Both frameworks emphasize the importance of a comprehensive risk assessment process while also highlighting the ongoing nature of risk management. This includes the identification, assessment, and prioritization of risks.

H. Internal Environment: Both frameworks acknowledge that the internal environment of an organization significantly impacts the framing and implementation of risk management strategies. This environment includes the organization’s risk culture, risk appetite, integrity, ethical values, etc.

I. Stakeholder Engagement: Both ISO 31000 and COSO ERM 2017 recognize the importance of stakeholder engagement in risk management. They encourage organizations to involve relevant stakeholders in the risk management process, fostering communication, collaboration, and shared understanding of risk-related issues.

J. Customization and Flexibility: Both frameworks provide guidance rather than prescriptive mandates, allowing organizations to tailor their risk management frameworks to their specific needs and context. They encourage customization and flexibility to ensure alignment with the organization’s unique risk profile and objectives.

K. Decision Making: Both ISO 31000 and COSO ERM 2017 recommend using a structured approach to risk-based decision making. They encourage integrating risk management into the decision-making process at every level of the organization.

L. Principle-based Guidelines: Both ISO 31000 and COSO ERM 2017 employ principle-based guidelines rather than prescriptive regulations. This means they propose fundamental truths that should be followed, but allow individual organizations to implement these principles according to their unique circumstances.

M. Value Creation: Both frameworks emphasize that effective risk management is not just about avoiding losses but also about creating value for the organization. By identifying and managing risks proactively, organizations can seize opportunities, enhance decision-making, and protect their reputation and long-term sustainability.

N. Communication and Consultation: Both frameworks stress the importance of timely and effective communication and consultation with stakeholders. The idea is to ensure everyone in the organization is aware of the risks and understands their role in managing them.

O. Evaluation: ISO 31000 and COSO ERM 2017 consider evaluation as a critical step in the risk management process. This includes both evaluating the effectiveness of the risk response and the risk management process itself.

P. Integration into Organizational Processes: Both models insist that risk management should not exist in a silo, but instead should be integrated into all organizational processes, strategies and decision making.

Q. Continuous Improvement: ISO 31000 and COSO ERM 2017 encourage organizations to foster a culture of continuous improvement with regards to risk management, promoting the idea of learning from past mistakes and successes.

In summary, both these frameworks are principles-based, they aim to instill a proactive risk management culture throughout the organization and they advocate for a holistic approach to managing risk that is fully integrated into the organization’s overall governance, strategy, and planning.

https://www.techtarget.com/searchcio/feature/ISO-31000-vs-COSO-Comparing-risk-management-standards#:~:text=ISO%2031000%20and%20COSO%20both,associated%20with%20either%20of%20them.